Requiring a 100% Job Match is Hurting Your Hiring Process

Written By Vivian Lazarevic

In today’s competitive job market, many hiring managers fall into the trap of seeking candidates whose résumés and experiences are a perfect match to the job description—line for line, skill for skill. On the surface, this seems logical: why not aim for someone who checks every box? But in reality, this approach can backfire. Not only is it unrealistic, but it also may signal a deeper issue—possibly even dishonesty on the part of the candidate.

The Myth of the “Perfect Match”

No candidate is a 100% match for any job. That level of alignment is not only rare—it’s practically impossible. Human beings are complex, and so are their careers. While job descriptions often read like wish lists, expecting an applicant to tick every box sets a dangerously high and rigid bar. According to Harvard Business Review, most men apply for jobs when they meet just 60% of the qualifications, while women tend to wait until they meet 100%—not because of confidence, but because they interpret the requirements more literally.

This highlights a key flaw: if you're filtering only for exact matches, you’re likely missing out on a large pool of highly capable candidates—especially those who bring diverse skills and perspectives.

When “Too Perfect” Is a Red Flag

There’s something suspicious about a résumé that mirrors a job post too closely. Sometimes it’s a sign that the applicant has simply copied and pasted language from the job description, a tactic often used to bypass Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). In more concerning cases, it could indicate that the candidate is stretching the truth—or outright lying.

In fact, a 2020 survey by Checkster found that 78% of job applicants admit to misrepresenting themselves on their resumes or in interviews. When the language is too aligned, it may reflect embellishment rather than experience. Hiring someone based on a fabricated resume can lead to poor job performance, high turnover, and wasted onboarding efforts.

The Value of the 50% Match

Instead of looking for a 100% match, aim for candidates who meet around 50-70% of your criteria. Why? Because those candidates bring something extra: potential, adaptability, and room to grow. They’re not just fitting a mold—they’re thinking beyond it.

Candidates with varied backgrounds can often see problems differently, offer innovative solutions, and bring cross-functional insights that more traditional applicants might not. Hiring someone with only direct experience may fill the seat, but hiring someone who adds value from an adjacent field can transform your team. LinkedIn’s 2023 Global Talent Trends report emphasizes that companies are increasingly prioritizing skills over degrees or exact title matches, signaling a broader shift in hiring philosophy.

Creativity Matters—Even in Operational Roles

Even roles that appear to be highly operational require a level of creativity and critical thinking. You don’t just want someone who can do the job—you want someone who can improve it. That improvement doesn’t come from someone who’s only ever done one exact thing before. It comes from someone who understands the broader landscape and can think beyond the immediate task.

Over-reliance on job-match algorithms or hiring managers overly focused on job post alignment risks building homogenous teams. These teams often lack the diversity of thought that is essential for innovation and resilience. A study by Boston Consulting Group found that companies with more diverse management teams have 19% higher revenue due to innovation.

Final Thoughts

Requiring a 100% match to a job post isn't just unrealistic—it's counterproductive. In the pursuit of the perfect candidate, hiring managers often overlook the ideal one. Someone who meets 50-70% of your requirements and brings a fresh, diversified background is likely to contribute more meaningfully in the long run.

Stop looking for clones. Start looking for contributors.

Sources:

Vivian Lazarevic
Next

Company Culture: Origins, Evolution, and the Need for Flexibility